Affirmative action in admissions - 英语听力.lrc

LRC歌词下载
[00:00.10]From VOA Learning English,
[00:03.14]this is the Education Report.
[00:06.43]Reaction appears mixed to a recent
[00:09.72]United States Supreme Court decision
[00:12.37]on affirmative action in university admissions.
[00:16.80]Affirmative action in admissions
[00:19.34]means that schools give special consideration
[00:22.63]to some racial or ethnic minorities.
[00:26.47]The goal is to create a more diverse campus,
[00:30.50]and to give more opportunities to groups
[00:33.45]that are under-represented in higher education.
[00:37.23]The Supreme Court ruled that race
[00:39.92]can be one of many factors considered
[00:43.60]when a student applies to a college or university.
[00:47.40]The court said education
[00:49.54]benefits from having diverse student populations.
[00:53.04]Some legal experts expressed surprise at the decision.
[00:58.41]They thought the justices would strike down
[01:01.41]a 2003 Supreme Court ruling.
[01:04.54]That ruling let universities use race in admissions decisions,
[01:10.98]but also said race needs to be just one factor among others.
[01:16.53]In the new decision,
[01:18.27]the justices did not deal with
[01:21.35]the question of affirmative action itself
[01:24.25]as many observers had expected.
[01:27.29]The court did not decide whether the idea
[01:30.84]violates the right of equal protection under the law,
[01:34.82]as guaranteed by the constitution.
[01:38.25]Instead, the justices sent the case
[01:42.30]back to a lower court for further consideration.
[01:46.82]A white woman who had been denied admission
[01:50.36]to the University of Texas at Austin brought the legal case.
[01:55.24]Abigail Fisher argued that it was wrong to reject her,
[01:59.78]when minority students with similar grades
[02:03.28]and test scores were accepted because of affirmative action.
[02:08.45]Wade Henderson is president of the Leadership Conference
[02:13.24]on Civil and Human Rights.
[02:15.43]He said the new decision reconfirms that it is an America's
[02:21.16]interest to increase opportunities for everyone.
[02:25.19]Justice Clarence Thomas,
[02:27.73]the only African-American on the Supreme Court,
[02:31.27]voted with the majority but wrote a separate opinion.
[02:35.81]His opinion strongly attacked affirmative action
[02:40.09]in college admissions as violating the constitution.
[02:44.73]He also said that the diversity by itself
[02:47.67]does not have any educational benefit.
[02:51.25]Ada Meloy is general counsel for the non-profit American Council on Education.
[02:58.68]"...that the colleges and universities should have the right
[03:04.81]to decide upon who will be admitted to the institution.
[03:09.79]And those that feel they need to consider race or ethnicity
[03:15.32]and make that decision should be able to do so,
[03:18.51]in line with the law that has been proclaimed
[03:23.24]by the Supreme Court since the 1970's."
[03:25.89]She said it is not clear how many of the 4,000 or so
[03:30.32]higher learning institutions in the United States
[03:33.95]use those criteria in deciding which student to accept.
[03:39.33]Ms. Meloy said many of the schools do not generally
[03:44.32]give special consideration to their applicants' race or ethnicity.
[03:49.95]And that's the Education Report from VOA Learning English.
[03:54.49]I'm Karen Leggett.
文本歌词
From VOA Learning English,
this is the Education Report.
Reaction appears mixed to a recent
United States Supreme Court decision
on affirmative action in university admissions.
Affirmative action in admissions
means that schools give special consideration
to some racial or ethnic minorities.
The goal is to create a more diverse campus,
and to give more opportunities to groups
that are under-represented in higher education.
The Supreme Court ruled that race
can be one of many factors considered
when a student applies to a college or university.
The court said education
benefits from having diverse student populations.
Some legal experts expressed surprise at the decision.
They thought the justices would strike down
a 2003 Supreme Court ruling.
That ruling let universities use race in admissions decisions,
but also said race needs to be just one factor among others.
In the new decision,
the justices did not deal with
the question of affirmative action itself
as many observers had expected.
The court did not decide whether the idea
violates the right of equal protection under the law,
as guaranteed by the constitution.
Instead, the justices sent the case
back to a lower court for further consideration.
A white woman who had been denied admission
to the University of Texas at Austin brought the legal case.
Abigail Fisher argued that it was wrong to reject her,
when minority students with similar grades
and test scores were accepted because of affirmative action.
Wade Henderson is president of the Leadership Conference
on Civil and Human Rights.
He said the new decision reconfirms that it is an America's
interest to increase opportunities for everyone.
Justice Clarence Thomas,
the only African-American on the Supreme Court,
voted with the majority but wrote a separate opinion.
His opinion strongly attacked affirmative action
in college admissions as violating the constitution.
He also said that the diversity by itself
does not have any educational benefit.
Ada Meloy is general counsel for the non-profit American Council on Education.
"...that the colleges and universities should have the right
to decide upon who will be admitted to the institution.
And those that feel they need to consider race or ethnicity
and make that decision should be able to do so,
in line with the law that has been proclaimed
by the Supreme Court since the 1970's."
She said it is not clear how many of the 4,000 or so
higher learning institutions in the United States
use those criteria in deciding which student to accept.
Ms. Meloy said many of the schools do not generally
give special consideration to their applicants' race or ethnicity.
And that's the Education Report from VOA Learning English.
I'm Karen Leggett.